Notes: Nebraska was the fourth state to enact NIL laws, but the effective date is still a year away. The bill will not come into force until July 1, 2023. In addition, there is a membership policy that allows universities to adopt NCAA guidelines or recognize state law sooner. While Creighton enforced the law on the first day of the NIL, Nebraska is taking a wait-and-see approach and sticking to its own NILE policy through 2023. Notes: Colorado Senate Bill 20-123 has passed, but will not go into effect until January 1, 2023. State law states that anyone offering legal representation must be a licensed attorney. Institutions will be able to conduct on-campus interviews for potential athletes and agents. More info: Since there were a handful of legislators, who up to 1. After lobbying for a bill in the state, the governor stepped in to respond to NIL with the help of officials at Ohio State University. Ohio`s decision, which was designed to be favorable to universities in the region, has allowed its schools to adapt their policies to the needs of an ever-changing landscape. Effective date: July 1, 2023 (all states must implement this law) Notes: Section 328 was introduced and read in the Vermont Senate in January 2020.
He has since died on the Education Committee. The state uses the NCAA`s preliminary NIL directive as its current regulation. The NCPA is a leading advocate for the rights of college athletes to earn money beyond NCAA-approved scholarships. Although the courts have signaled that they are moving toward granting this freedom to college athletes, the NCAA did not adopt a comprehensive policy until July 1, when some of the state`s NIL laws went into effect, leading to the current ad hoc system. Notes: For the second consecutive term, an NIL bill was introduced in the Massachusetts State Legislature. Until July 1, 2022, there was no new movement. Massachusetts Senate Bill 2813 is standard compared to other state laws. Bay State institutions are currently following the NCAA`s interim policy.
More info: A second example of a state without a book law making a belated push toward legislation, Virginia became the 30th state to enact a NIL bill in the country. However, in the same action that SB 223 passed, the governor vetoed House Bill 1298, which included a ban on activities for high school athletes. Additional Information: Similar to other laws passed in the southern United States, the Mississippi Act covers most of the general features described above. A single provision that Parliament included treated the participation of boosters in NILE activities as a form of incentive to register. In accordance with NCAA`s interim policy, the direct mention of boosters was unique to Mississippi. Mississippi went even further in April 2022 with the passage of Senate Bill 2690, which allows the state`s schools to participate in negotiations on the athletes` NIL deal. The NIL laws of several states contain different restrictions on the types of support agreements that student-athletes can enter into. A general restriction prohibits contractual conditions from extending beyond the period during which the athlete attends university athletics at a particular institution. Another common restriction prohibits endorsement contracts from being directly related to athletic performance. In addition, several states grant institutions the power to set certain restrictions on student-athlete contracts, rather than imposing them directly. For example, to allow institutions to restrict the athlete`s use of team logos for personal names, images and similarities. Notes: Montana also took the slow approach, as the law didn`t go into effect until June 1, 2023.
Nevertheless, state universities have been allowed to publish their own policies. The most notable piece of Montana law allows schools to serve as an agent for the student-athlete. Additional information: Arizona`s status is arguably one of the least influential state laws on the map and essentially submits to the NCAA`s interim policy. Notably, Arizona`s law in nature does not allow student-athletes to engage in NILE activities using institutional trademarks or logos. Although laws have been passed by the NCAA, it is crucial for student-athletes to understand the rules and regulations of their states and schools. Many schools have specific guidelines for agreements and sponsors that their student-athletes can sign. More info: Although many of the same provisions as in other states are included and come into force on July 1, the Georgian law is widely considered a sunset. Although many State institutions consider their law null and void, the same general features of the law have been applied to school policy. Notes: There is no state legislation regarding NIL in Delaware. As these considerations continue, the NCPA believes college athletes, potential transfers and current recruits now need a tool to help them negotiate the dizzying array of nil laws. And if states enact NILE laws or relax laws that are too restrictive to get a more favorable rating from the NCPA, so much the better.
More info: For the second year in a row, Massachusetts state lawmakers have introduced a NIL bill. State NILE laws have some common features, particularly in terms of restrictions on student-athletes. A common limitation limits the duration of contracts; Many laws stipulate that contractual terms cannot exceed the length of time the athlete attends varsity athletics at a particular institution. Notes: New Hampshire House Bill 1505 was introduced to lawmakers in June 2020. There was no pressure to enact a state law. The NCAA`s interim policy is currently in effect in the Granite State. In addition to industry-specific restrictions on NIL endorsement agreements, 23 states restrict or allow institutions to restrict agreements that directly conflict with existing endorsement agreements between third parties and the institution. To ensure student-athlete contracts are not in conflict, nearly all of the state`s NIL laws require athletes to disclose their contracts to the school. Of the 29 states that have adopted NIL rules, only Arizona and New Mexico do not include disclosure requirements. [1] The following states have enacted laws dealing with the Nile that are currently in force: Arizona, Arkansas, Colorado, Connecticut, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Mississippi, Missouri, Nebraska, Nevada, New Mexico, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas and Virginia.
Additional information: The governor of North Carolina, with the influence of many state legislators and institutional officials, took executive action to protect student-athletes in the state shortly after the rule change. Notes: California Senate Bill 206 was passed in September 2019, triggering a domino effect of states passing NIL legislation that went into effect prior to SB206`s initial implementation date of January 1, 2023. In addition, many NIL laws give institutions the flexibility to set their own school-specific restrictions on the companies their student-athletes enter. For example, to allow schools to restrict the athlete`s use of team logos for their own name, likeness and likeness. Less commonly, some laws impose restrictions that prohibit student-athletes from contracting with certain industries such as adult entertainment, alcohol, tobacco, and firearms, to name a few. Regardless, most academic institutions prohibit association with these types of industries through their own NIL policy. More info: Another severely restricted state, Texas lawmakers have included provisions in their law to prevent student-athletes from using school logos, among other things. While there has been no shortage of frustration over the restrictive nature of the state law, the Texas legislative cycle prevents any major change activity unless it convenes a special session.
Read more: Louisiana law is noisy in the vice standard industries, requires prior approval for the use of institutional marks, and requires at least five hours of financial knowledge and life skills training for student-athletes at the beginning of their first and third year of college. Nevertheless, state lawmakers have taken steps to change the law. Similarly, the Big Ten, where Maryland came closest to getting its NIL law in the NCPA analysis among member schools, with the NCPA citing four (out of 21) restrictive aspects of its law in its score of 81%.